Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸°­ ³» ½ºÄ³´× ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¦ÀÛµÈ Æú¸®¿ì·¹Åº ¸ðÇüÀÇ Á¤È®µµ Æò°¡

Evaluation of validity of polyurethane model fabricated by intra-oral scanning method

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 36±Ç 2È£ p.91 ~ 96
±è¿øÅÂ, À̺´±â, ÇöÁ¾±¸, ±è±â¹é,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿øÅ ( Kim Won-Tae ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú
À̺´±â ( Lee Byung-Ki ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú
ÇöÁ¾±¸ ( Hyun Joung-Ku ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú
±è±â¹é ( Kim Ki-Baek ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was evaluate the validity of polyurethane model fabricated by intra oral scanning method.

Methods: Ten sam cases of stone models were manufactured from master model, and polyurethane models were made with the intra oral scanning and CNC milling method. One examiner individually measured 6 distances(intercanine distance, intermolar distance, two dental arch lengths(right, left) and two diagonal of dental arch lengths(right, left) on the stone models and the polyurethane models. The Mann-Whitney U test(¥á=0.05) were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean difference between measurements made directly on the stone models and those made on the polyurethane models was 0.31-0.38mm. No statistically differences between the two groups were founded 4 distances(p>0.05), but 2 distances were statistically significant(p<0.05).

Conclusion: Stone models showed larger than polyurethane models fabricated by intra oral scanning method.

Å°¿öµå

Dental CAD-CAM; Dental model; Digital dentistry; Intra oral scanning

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI